http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2636
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |LATER
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-03 16:28 -------
1. this depends on people. people who do mostly installations are not interested
in changelogs, more in files. but some people who do upgrades like you are more
interested in the changelog; in which case, you can launch rpmdrake with the
option "--changelog-first"; (that should be better configurable, but still is
better than nothing for the moment)
2. hum yes you're right; i'll rephrase after the 9.1 release
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date:
description:
Just a couple of minor points that I feel might improve the UI for rpmdrake.
These are of course personal preference, however I guess user feedback is of
some use to you.
When selecting 'Maximum information', the information I am generally interested
in is to do with versions and version history, it is very rare that I am
interested in the files associated with the rpm as these are generally the same
as the old rpm, and it is a bit annoying to have to scroll through thousands of
lines of files to see what is included in the latest change.
With this in mind I think laying out the information in the following order
might make rpmdrake a little more user friendly.
Name:
Version:
Currently installed Version:
Source:
Size:
Summary:
Description:
Change Log:
Files:
The second point is very trivial, when 'right' clicking over the packages list,
the second line down reads 'Reload the packages list', this is a little
misleading as it sort of implies that the package list will be downloaded again.
It might make it a little clearer if this line were changed to 'Refresh
packages list'.
I hope this kind of feedback is of some interest, even though I realise
technically it is not a bug.
Kind regards,
Robert Thorneycroft
