gauret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to add that I apology for not reporting this earlier. Since > it was already there in 9.0 and it is no showstopper, I think it's > fine if you don't fix it for 9.1.
anyway, considering its severity, i would not have fixed it now, we only fix major bugs because of the chance to introduce new bugs. what's more, it's a contrib package
