Just to make sure that everyone is clear on the division of responsibilities:  

* ITRE has SOLE competence on:
  o   Article 1 (3)  - reference to the electronic communications Directive
  o   Article 3.1(a) - as above
  o   Article 7 - CERTS
  o   Recitals 5, 11, 23 - which covered the above issues
*ITRE has SHARED competence with IMCO on:
  o   Article 1(2) (Subject matter and scope);
  o   Article 3(1)(b-c); Article 3(2-4), (6-7), (11) (Definitions);
  o   Article 8 (Cooperation network);
  o   Article 9 (Secure information-sharing system);
  o   Article 10 (Early warnings);
  o   Article 11 (Coordinated response);
  o   Article 12 (Union NIS cooperation plan);
  o   Article 14 (Security requirements and incident notification);
  o   Article 15 (Implementation and enforcement);
  o   Article 18 (Exercise of the delegation);
  o   Article 19 (Committee procedure);
  o   Recitals 12-20, 22, 24-31, 34-36.

In the case of shared competence, it is possible that IMCO and ITRE will 
coordinate and try to reach common opinions.  If not, ITRE can re-table its 
amendments when the discussion goes into plenary.

There are two other committees with competence:  LIBE and SEDE.  If I 
understand correctly, these are exclusive competence, so their input should be 
accepted directly by IMCO.  However, some of this is disturbing (liability of 
software producers, for example).

Best

Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Wim Degezelle
Sent: 17 October 2013 23:34
To: 'Bastiaan Goslings'; 'Gordon Lennox'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament

Hi All,
The leading Committee in EP on the NIS Directive is IMCO (Internal Market) with 
Andreas Schwab as Rapporteur. Where there is a so-called 'shared competence' 
the ITRE Committee and LIBE Committee take the lead.

Procedure file:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&refere
nce=COM%282013%290048 

Best,
Wim
CENTR

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:cooperation-wg- 
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Bastiaan Goslings
> Sent: donderdag 17 oktober 2013 16:33
> To: Gordon Lennox
> Cc: Bastiaan Goslings; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
> 
> On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Gordon Lennox 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > The European Internet Foundation includes a group of MEPs who have a
> clear interest in Internet matters.
> >
> > https://www.eifonline.org/members.html
> >
> > There are others of course!
> 
> 
> Thanks, Gordon - btw do you know which EU parliamentarian 'committee'
> was being referred to during the Coop session today in Athens?
> Supposedly this would give one an indication which national MEP(s) to 
> approach re the proposed NIS Directive...
> 
> Btw I have been talking to the Dutch representative in the Council's 
> working group (hope that is the correct English translation) and 
> learnt that from her perspective nothing has really changed or been 
> done since the initial position/reflection re the proposed Directive 
> went to the Dutch Parliament in in March...
> 
> (a position btw that states similar concerns as the ones that RIPE NCC
> mentioned)
> 
> Bastiaan
> AMS-IX
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to