I would like to draw your attention to a particular item in the IANAXFER
proposal:
It would be appreciated if more community members found some time
between the festivities to read and comment on the proposals.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] NRO-NC role in Review Committee
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:00:56 +0200
From: Alan Barrett <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
There has been a suggestion that the work of the "Review
Committee" proposed in the CRISP draft should be handled by the
NRO-NC, or alternatively, that the chair of the NRO-NC should be
co-opted to serve on the Review Committee.
The CRISP Team believes that is would be wise to to keep the
operational performance review process independent of the policy
development process. Because the NRO-NC (or ASO-AC) has a role
in global policy development, we think that the proposed Review
Committee should be independent of the NRO-NC.
The draft proposal says "The NRO Executive Council shall establish
a Review Committee that will advise and assist the NRO Executive
Council in its periodic review. Any such Review Committee should
be a team composed of representatives from each RIR region ...".
The CRISP Team has not discussed how many members the Review
Committee might have, or what procedure the NRO EC might follow in
choosing the members.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
_______________________________________________
ianaxfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
