Dear Colleagues, Please find below the CRISP Team’s review of the IANA Numbering Services SLA Draft produced by the RIR legal team.
We welcome comments on this review on the <[email protected]> mailing list until Tuesday 9 June UTC23:59. Kind regards, Nurani On behalf of the RIPE CRISP team > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Izumi Okutani <[email protected]> > Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] Call for comments on the CRISP Review of the SLA > Date: 4 juni 2015 01:21:00 CEST > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > As announced by the NRO, the SLA text based on the numbers community proposal > is open for the community consultation by the NRO. > > https://www.nro.net/news/call-for-comments-for-a-draft-sla-for-the-iana-numbering-services > > We would like to share the CRISP Team's review of the SLA, and welcome > comments from the community on the review before: Tue 9th June UTC23:59. > > The CRISP Team review was based on the principles below: > > - The review focuses and limits its scope on whether the SLA is consistent > with the numbers community proposal. > - Specific legal provisions in the SLA are therefore outside the scope of > this review. > - We note that not all elements of the numbers community proposal which is to > be implemented in the SLA; > There are implementation to be handled outside the SLA, such as transfer of > the IPR which belong to the public domain (e.g.IANA trademark, iana.org > domain), and setting up of the Review Committee. > > Feedback from the community on <[email protected]> will be taken into > consideration with the same principles as described above. > > Overall, the CRISP Team found that the SLA is consistent with the numbers > community proposal. > However there are a few points where we observed more clarifications are > needed, could be read as more definitive than what has bene agreed, or the > SLA text could be interpreted as not being consistent. > Please see the attached review for more details. > > We note that on Article 10, there were some differences in opinion on whether > it is consistent with the numbers community proposal. > Further discussion in the CRISP Team did not reveal any opposition to the > version of the response we are sharing now with the community, before the > deadline for comments within the CRISP Team. > > After closing the community feedback, we are planning to submit the CRISP > Team's SLA review incorporating relevant community feedback to the NRO by > 14th June UTC23:59 deadline. > > > Izumi Okutani, Nurani Nimpuno > Chair, Vice Chair of the CRISP Team
Review of the SLA-20150603.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
> _______________________________________________ > ianaxfer mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
