FYI. Nurani Vice chair, CRISP team
Begin forwarded message: > From: Izumi Okutani <[email protected]> > Date: 2 April 2016 at 01:41:32 GMT+2 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] CRISP Team review of the Updated 5th Draft SLA for > the IANA Numbering Services > > Dear Colleagues, > > > The CRISP Team has reviewed the 5th Draft SLA, and we observe no > inconsistencies observed with the number community proposal, i.e., the ICG > proposal,including the changes made from the 4th Draft. > > Updated 5th Draft SLA for the IANA Numbering Services > https://www.nro.net/news/updated-5th-draft-sla-for-the-iana-numbering-services > > The focus of our review remains unchanged, and we primarily reviewed whether > the SLA sufficiently covers the following four key elements of the number > community proposal. > > * Service level requirements of the IANA Numbering Services are clearly > defined to meet the expectations of the RIRs and the Internet numbers > community > * The RIRs, and the Internet number Community through the Review Committee > are able to conduct review of the service level, to ensure the service level > is met in accordance with the SLA > * The RIRs have the ability to terminate the SLA, while at the same time > ensuring the stability of the IANA Numbering Services, in accordance with the > number community proposal > * The IPR and rights over data are transferred, in accordance with the number > community proposal > > We would like to thank RIRs and ICANN for developing the 5th Draft in timely > manner, and sharing it in a continued transparent manner with Internet number > community. > For accountability of the SLA to be based on the ICG proposal with support > from the community, it is our expectation that the completion of this SLA > will continue to take place in such a transparent and open manner. > > As we have expressed in our review for the 4th Draft, as SLA provides the > Internet number community with its required accountability measures on IANA > Numbering Services, it must be considered as an essential commitment along > with other improvements to ICANN’s accountability. While the SLA will have no > effect until the transition actually takes place on 30 September 2016, it > should be finalsed and signed, no later than the finalised changes to the > ICANN Bylaws which have been specified by CCWG-accountability. > > It is our understanding and expectation that, the next version, reflecting > feedback from the public comment by NRO until 15th April will be the final > version of the SLA. > We trust the RIRs and ICANN continue to work constructively and transparently > to finalise an SLA that respects the wishes of the number community including > the timeline of its finalisation. > > > Best Regards, > Izumi Okutani and Nurani Nimpuno > on behalf of the CRISP Team > > _______________________________________________ > ianaxfer mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
