|
On 06.06.2016 20.23, Roger Jørgensen
wrote:
I thought I shared this already: but here comesOn Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Gordon Lennox <[email protected]> wrote: <snip>Where I diverge a little from Jim, and the topic has come up recently on this list, is when it comes to outreach and to what extent co-chairs are supposed to represent the WG and indeed RIPE elsewhere.<snip>This area is a bit different from others and maybe particularly when it comes to outreach where NCC has been very much involved.<snip>Where I am less comfortable is about outreach being part of the job description of WG Co-chairs. I also wonder to what extent participants in the WG can also take on this kind of task. I think this needs to be discussed further. In Madrid when we have our full complement of co-chairs?... may I ask what we expect our chairs todo? Help RIPE NCC in the outreach, or help in the outreach-job by let all the other around RIPE have an arena to meet the community? https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-542 Cut and paste most relevant parts: 5. Policy Development Process (PDP) Responsibilities WG Chairs are expected to:
(...) 6. RIPE Meetings Responsibilities i) General/Plenary WG Chairs are expected to:
ii) Working Group Specific WG chairs are expected to:
Representation is not part of the role description.If a chair is doing outreach, who are a chair of this WG representing? I would say none, whoever it is cannot represent us. Difficult. Chairing the group is. -hph -- Hans Petter Holen Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | [email protected] | http://hph.oslo.net |
- [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes Gordon Lennox
- Re: [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes Roger Jørgensen
- Re: [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes Hans Petter Holen
