On 6 Feb 2020, at 11:27, Nick Hilliard (INEX) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can someone point out the bit in this letter which strives for transparency? > I'm struggling to find it.
I’m struggling to find the bit which makes the sale of PIR a matter for the NRO/ASO. Why is a body representing the *numbering* community getting itself involved in an issue for the *naming* community? I don’t recall seeing much (any?) discussion of the PIR sale on RIPE’s lists. So with little or no bottom-up input I don’t understand how this issue made its way on the ASO/NRO’s agenda. Can somebody explain?
