Please see below. Thanks and best, Richard
> -----Original Message----- > From: cooperation-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Daniel Karrenberg > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 12:33 > To: Gordon Lennox > Cc: Cooperation WG RIPE > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030 > > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 10:06, Gordon Lennox wrote: > > > Meanwhile this is from ETSI: … > > > However we read these proposals to re-invent things from the standards > politics angle, the messages RIPE should send are: > > The Internet with TCP/IP protocols is the global utility for > communication these days. Any new standards, especially those tailored > to particular operational domains like mobile, must be interoperable > and > any new deployments must interoperate. I can't resist adding that, in hindsight, it would have been better if IPv6 had been backwards compatible with IPv4. > > Hallway talk: the atrocious kludges that are deployed today for running > Internet over mobile are partly due to the relevant standards bodies > not > talking. > > Therefore anyone proposing to do work on standards needs to at least > closely work with the IETF in the standardisation area if not work > within the IETF. As I presume we all know, standardization is a very competitive business, and forum-shopping is a fact of life. If one SDO does not deliver what participants want, they will move to a different SDO. > > RIPE remains ready to provide a forum for discussing the deployment and > operation of any new protocols and for developing operational > guidelines. > > Makes sense? Naive? > > Daniel
