I think issuing the statement is a good idea. Maybe you want to add a point that there is a risk of disruption of service when changing something that has been working for more than 25 years? Salam
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:16 PM Desiree Miloshevic <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear members, dear all > > Further to the RIPE NCC’s summary of the DNS4EU Open House discussion and > further to your witnessing of our earlier 'transparent wordsmithing > consultation' with other RIPE - WG Chairs, > I’d like to propose the following high level statement draft for your > consideration. > > Julf and myself, as Co-Chairs are in agreement with this draft statement > and Achilleas had excused himself due to his affiliation with the EC. > > We’d like to know if there is some support from members for having a RIPE > community response on this proposal? > > We would really appreciate your feedback or any comments you’d wish to > make or if you'd like us to work further on this. > > Many thanks for your consideration and the feedback, > > Desiree > -- > Coop WG Co-Chair > > Proposed DNS4EU RIPE community statement comments > > > > 1. RIPE community believes that governance of the DNS resolution > chain, which is such an important element of everybody's Internet > connectivity, should involve all stakeholders and can not solely rely on > legislation and regulatory oversight. > > > 1. > > RIPE Community hopes that any winning bidder will adhere to what we > see as a fundamental property of the Internet, with a diverse and > competitive landscape, anchored on the principles of multistakeholder > Internet governance. > > 2. RIPE Community believes that the responsibility of well-functioning > Internet access including the DNS resolution is with the access providers. > We believe it should stay that way. > > 3. We understand that to be able to minimise some risks when the end > user selects a random DNS resolver, a possible and feasible solution is to > have the access provider run their local DNS resolvers and/or an additional > DNS resolver as a back-up. > > 4. > > We hope that the EU could allocate DNS4EU funds to the local Internet > community and encourage Internet access providers to run their local DNS > resolvers. Additionally, the funds can be also used towards the development > of open source software for better and affordable DNS resolution services. > > > On 2 Feb 2022, at 15:26, Chris Buckridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > Thank you to all who joined for the RIPE NCC Open House discussion of > DNS4EU on Monday, 31 January. We have posted a summary of some key points > and links to the video archive here: > > https://labs.ripe.net/author/chrisb/dns4eu-ripe-ncc-open-house-discussion/ > > Cheers > Chris > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or > change your subscription options, please visit: https: > <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg> > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg >
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg
