I'd say that twittering emotions -- or any other specific flavor of content -- won't happen spontaneously in a group, but emerge for some reason (often because of leadership) or are explicitly requested, or modeled.
Howard Rheingold [email protected] http://twitter.com/hrheingold http://www.rheingold.com http://www.smartmobs.com http://vlog.rheingold.com what it is ---> is --->up to us On May 15, 2009, at 2:09 PM, MarcD wrote: > > Hello, > I was having a discussion on Twitter and how content tend to be more > emotional ( or say: less filtered) than through regular messaging. In > the case of the discussion, it was a good thing, allowing a project > manager to flag issues on a project earlier than he would be able to > otherwise. But beyond this, I am wondering: > do you tweet emotions, or information, or both? If you tweet emotions, > what the value for you? for your followers? Could the health of a > group (as in "good chemistry") be measured by the volume of emitional > tweets? > I would think that the tighter the community, the more of these tweets > you would see, but does anybody has any data on this? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CooperationCommons" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CooperationCommons?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
