On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 17:53 +0000, Paul Emsley wrote:
> Doing this would make Coot internals messy so I have make this
> request
> for comments before I spend time reworking things and producing a
> solution that no-one will use.
>
I second Miguel's opinion. Assuming that residue names are case
sensitive and numbers/underscores are allowed, there are ~250,000 names
available. Hard to imagine that one would need this many to be refined
in coot simultaneously. And why would anyone work with multiple
different ligands that are deliberately assigned the same 3-letter code?
Seems to invite trouble.
--
"Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!"
Julian, King of Lemurs
