-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear Ed,

what resolution do your data have which make you think that the map
you are staring at is without model bias? It is worth splitting the
whole side chain for dual conformations and unlikely that really only
one single atom as two possible conformations.

Regards,
Tim

On 06/06/2012 09:16 PM, Ed Pozharski wrote:
> Are there plans to implement a "partial" double conformer feature?
> What I mean by this is that currently one can only choose whether
> to make alternate conformers with or without backbone atoms.  I am
> staring at a methionine which only appears to have CE in different
> position, so it does not seem reasonable to have alternate
> positions for every other side chain atom.
> 
> The workaround is to create double conformer for the whole side
> chain and then delete individual atoms - 4 clicks in this case,
> quite doable. But I thought maybe there is some trimming option or
> ideally one would be asked at which atom to split the chain.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ed.
> 

- -- 
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFPz8o+UxlJ7aRr7hoRAsHeAKCp8ZQXkFXh5Zy8GrhxwI540O+NrACgudyZ
/GRSaxHHcba2IzrtDERkopk=
=7k3o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to