On Saturday, 20 April 2013, Jinzhong Lin wrote:
> Dear Coot users,
> 
> I have been refining the crystal structure of a large assembly which has 
> half a million of atoms.  In the PDB, when atom number exceeds 99999, it 
> starts to use letters such as A0000. Everything was fine for phenix and 
> coot to deal with such a structure until recently I tried to refine the 
> TLS parameters. The TLS refinement puts ANISOU record below each ATOM 
> line in the PDB file and when the atom number has 5 digits it 
> concatenates with ANISOU giving something like:
> 
> ATOM  99999  O2*  Cr A 453      41.217  18.570 115.721 1.00107.41      
> 16S1 O
> ANISOU99999  O2*  Cr A 453    18694  11085  11032  -1586    395 -1101  
> 16S1 O
> ATOM  A0000  C1*  Cr A 453      42.986  17.740 114.321 1.00106.92      
> 16S1 C
> ANISOUA0000  C1*  Cr A 453    18592  11040  10992  -1526    256 -1044  
> 16S1 C

Lovely. Not.

I really disapprove of the idea of writing out ANISOU records to
describe TLS refinement.  Notwithstanding the fact that the PDB
recommends this, I strongly suggest that you tell refmac _not_
to write out ANISOU records.   The TLS model is adequately 
described in the header, the extra ANISOU records are a less
good way of describing the same thing.

                Ethan


> When I try to open the PDB file in coot, it gives an error:
> 
> ERROR 14 READ: Unmatch in different records for the same atom.
>           LINE #200536
>       ANISOUA0000  C1*  Cr A 453    18592  11040  10992  -1526 256  
> -1044  16S1 C
> 
> It looks like coot does not recognize ANISOU followed by a letter 
> without space in between. (ANISOU99999 is fine)
> 
> I am not sure if it is a bug of coot or it is inherited from mmdb. I 
> would appreciate it very much if anyone can help me out or give me a clue.
> 
> The TLS refinement gives me significant improvement in both map and 
> RFree,  It's a shame I can not use it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> lithlin
> 


-- 
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire.
  - Gustav Mahler

Reply via email to