On Sáb, 2016-03-05 at 09:03 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:31:35 +0000 > Sérgio Basto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello , > > Since a long time I have some questions about legal issues, in some > > perspectives , so I decide start by this Mailing List ... > You may want to try the legal list, but sure... > > > > > In Faq What I can build in Copr? > > > > Forbidden items , but not packages that are not compliment as > > packages > > guidelines . > > > > The minitube review [1] was not accepted because > > is not_useful_without_ external_bits [2] but I can build it in Copr > > isn't it ? > This ticket is related I think: > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1517 > > IMHO, you could build minitube in copr as long as it doesn't have any > hard dependencies on rpmfusion or other 3rd party packages. > > > > > The second question , should be more legal is about openssl , > > Fedora > > and RedHat begging re-enable ECC/ECDHE/EC/ECDSA/elliptic curves [3] > > algorithms in openssl, but they just enabled a few curves , looks > > to > > me that is legal have all curves enabled , other distributions like > > Debian does , so I think Fedora just enabled what really needs and > > stay more safe , and I ? can I build openssl without restrictions ? > > as I wrote, I don't see any legal impediment . > No. IMHO this is not acceptable in copr. The reason Fedora doesn't > enable them all is patents. I have no idea (nor do I want to) know > which patents over what, but the ones we can enable have been > carefully > checked by legal. The others are not acceptable.
Thanks I think we need legal department do a complete list of legal and not legal curves, because AFAIK official package just have some curves but by choice . -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
