On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other > > > > > branched > > > > > repos ? Please . > > > > There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already. > > > I guess I understand; Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64 > > > repository > > > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64. > > I'm checking now , yes, none of my project have f25 buildroots > > enabled, > > when f25 was created, projects should (IMHO) inherited same > > configuration of rawhide . > > > > So yes ," Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64 repository > > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ". > > > And checking other projects in copr , all projects that I checked also > don't have f25 buildroots enabled , so maybe it not a bad idea apply > the rule right now .
Thanks, isn't _this_ exactly what the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790 is about? Which would mean (in case we made what Sérgio suggests) _no change_ in rawhide policy is actually needed in copr? Thanks for clarification, Pavel _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
