On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 3:27:38 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, May 14, 2018 2:20:28 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > Can we cover it just by providing "with" and "without" fields for
> > chroots/builds which would then basically translate to --with/--without
> > options for mock, rpkg, and similar tools?
>
> You could add any other mock option that way, especially --define is
> important in this context.
>
> Btw. slight -1 since any such feature makes the build reproducibility
> harder -- build result depends not only on chroot content, but also on
> some random database values, stored only in (Fedora) copr. So in turn it
> slightly lowers the overall quality of packages coming from copr and thus
> rises chances that such package won't ever be merged into Fedora.
No {review,pull-request,discussion}:
https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/98
Pavel
_______________________________________________
copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/J4CWYDUNLRJTHBNKOZPCPRXHCHU5OY6O/
