On 7/1/20 10:23 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> I'm guessing that consistent build results is not an uncommon goal. > > Definitely.
good to hear. > But the forgemeta (triggering dynamic source downloads) thing > brings a lot of variables in to the game. noted. >> I need to revisit/rethink this. It seems that SRPMS are the preferred >> 'input' ... > > I don't want to claim `src.rpm` upload is preferred method (both methods > should just work), it is just more straightforward and there's less space > to make a mistake (both on build submitter and copr sides). ok. then i'll continue to poke at this until both "just work". > I mean, compare youre src.rpm with copr-generated src.rpm (rpmdiff, e.g.). > And any peculiarity. yup. >>> We can lend you some copr builder >>> temporarily if you need it for debugging (so you can try the `copr-rpmbuild` >>> commands manually). >> >> lol. still a Fedora-land noob, here. >> I have no idea what 'lend you some copr builder' means or entails! yet ... > > I mean, if you (a) contact us off-list with your ssh key, (b) we can > allocate a copr builder VM for you, (c) setup the ssh access there for you > and (d) than throw the VM away when you don't need it. ah, thx! > If it makes your debugging easier... dunno yet. if it does, i'll contact as offered. o/ _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
