[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12564238#action_12564238
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-1751:
---------------------------------------------
Could you please inter-link related issues. This would substantially simplify
tracking their progress.
> FSDataset.invalidate() throws IOException trying to delete a block which is
> not in the data-node blockMap
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-1751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1751
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.14.0
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>
> Here is what I get in the data-node log. This is happening regularly, but not
> all the time.
> {code}
> 07/08/21 15:22:20 INFO dfs.DataNode: Deleting block blk_5351209297984813226
> file /hadoop-data/ndfs/data/current/blk_5351209297984813226
> 07/08/21 15:22:20 INFO dfs.DataNode: Deleting block blk_8240763237624393278
> file /hadoop-data/ndfs/data/current/blk_8240763237624393278
> 07/08/21 15:22:21 WARN dfs.DataNode: Unexpected error trying to delete block
> blk_5351209297984813226. Block not found in blockMap.
> 07/08/21 15:22:21 WARN dfs.DataNode: Unexpected error trying to delete block
> blk_8240763237624393278. Block not found in blockMap.
> 07/08/21 15:22:21 WARN dfs.DataNode: java.io.IOException: Error in deleting
> blocks.
> at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSDataset.invalidate(FSDataset.java:714)
> at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.processCommand(DataNode.java:590)
> at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.offerService(DataNode.java:493)
> at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.run(DataNode.java:1310)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> {code}
> The data-node successfully removed two blocks and then one second later
> received another request
> from the name-node to remove the same two blocks.
> # I don't see why the data-node should throw an exception in this case at
> all. It is a clear warning.
> Even if it does it should use the same description as in the warning
> message.
> # Name-node calculates blocks to remove for a data-node in two cases: a
> heartbeat and a block-report.
> I suspect that this is what happened here. The 2 blocks were first
> requested to be removed in reply to
> the heartbeat and the in reply to the block report (or vice versa).
> The question is why name-node returns the same blocks twice?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.