[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565136#action_12565136
 ] 

Runping Qi commented on HADOOP-2568:
------------------------------------


Fetching all the available segments (produced by multiple mappers)  for the 
same reducer from a node  
is a good idea, and should be easy to implement. It will definitely improve the 
shuffling efficiency
by reducing the number of round-trips and by increasing the payload size. This 
will be especially significant
for large jobs with a large number of mappers per node. 

Introducing a separate shuffling phase need more study. It will complicate the 
framework significantly.
Depending on the actual implementation, the net benefits are not that obvious.



> Pin reduces with consecutive IDs to nodes and have a single shuffle task per 
> job per node
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-2568
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2568
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Devaraj Das
>             Fix For: 0.17.0
>
>
> The idea is to reduce disk seeks while fetching the map outputs. If we 
> opportunistically pin reduces with consecutive IDs (like 5, 6, 7 .. 
> max-reduce-tasks on that node) on a node, and have a single shuffle task, we 
> should benefit, if for every fetch, that shuffle task fetches all the outputs 
> for the reduces it is shuffling for. In the case where we have 2 reduces per 
> node, we will decrease the #seeks in the map output files on the map nodes by 
> 50%. Memory usage by that shuffle task would be proportional to the number of 
> reduces it is shuffling for (to account for the number of ramfs instances, 
> one per reduce). But overall it should help. 
> Thoughts?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to