On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2. a release note text box > > Shouldn't folks just include CHANGES.txt message in the patch? That's > what I've always encouraged, but few are ever provided. Perhaps Hudson > can bounce patches that don't touch CHANGES.txt? >
I like this idea, though would be concerned about the ability of patch(1) to properly apply diffs containing the CHANGES.txt entry --- it seems like they'd quickly be obsolete just because another patch has added an entry. Perhaps they could be included a second (non-diff) attachment? rick
