[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580501#action_12580501
]
Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-3048:
------------------------------------------------
I like the idea of Stringifier interface.
In the patch, there are quite a few @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") tag in the
codes. Is it possible to make the generics right and get ride of the tags?
> Stringifier
> -----------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3048
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 0.17.0
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Fix For: 0.17.0
>
> Attachments: stringifier_v1.patch, stringifier_v2.patch
>
>
> Storing arbitrary objects in the configuration has been discussed before in
> HADOOP-449 and HADOOP-1873. Although enabling such functionality has the risk
> of encouraging people to put big binary objects in the configuration, for
> some use cases passing objects to tasks is absolutely necessary.
> This issue will track the implementation of a Stringifier interface which
> stringifies and destringifies objects. Using this implementation, developers
> can store objects in the configuration and restore them later.
> Any thoughts ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
