[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-3146:
----------------------------------
Component/s: (was: mapred)
dfs
Description:
Starting fron hadoop-0.17, calling flush of dfs becomes very expensive.
It does not make much sense to call flush inside append.
was:
Starting fron hadoop-0.17, calling flush of dfs becomes very expensive.
It does not make much sense to call flush inside append.
Actually, I would vote for HDFS to make flush cheaper again. Flush should *not*
mean that your bytes have reached the disk. It should only mean that they have
been sent to the operating system.
> SequenceFile should not call flush excessively
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3146
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3146
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Reporter: Runping Qi
>
> Starting fron hadoop-0.17, calling flush of dfs becomes very expensive.
> It does not make much sense to call flush inside append.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
