[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12589436#action_12589436
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-2703:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12380220/HADOOP-2703-4.patch
against trunk revision 645773.
@author +1. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
tests included +1. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
javadoc +1. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
javac +1. The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler
warnings.
release audit +1. The applied patch does not generate any new release
audit warnings.
findbugs +1. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
core tests -1. The patch failed core unit tests.
contrib tests +1. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2248/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2248/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2248/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2248/console
This message is automatically generated.
> New files under lease (before close) still shows up as MISSING files/blocks
> in fsck
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-2703
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2703
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.15.3
> Reporter: Koji Noguchi
> Assignee: lohit vijayarenu
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.18.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-2703-1.patch, HADOOP-2703-2.patch,
> HADOOP-2703-3.patch, HADOOP-2703-4.patch
>
>
> On 0.15.3 which includes HADOOP-2540 ("Empty blocks make fsck report corrupt,
> even when it isn't") fix, we are still seeing fsck reporting missing blocks
> when they aren't. Basically, any unclosed small files under lease shows up
> as MISSING.
> Can we have an option in fsck to skip those files under lease?
> Or count those files/blocks separately?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
