[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591360#action_12591360
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-3164:
--------------------------------------
bq. Also, increasing the default buffer size can have a significant impact on
memory usage, since some applications open lots of streams, and each open
stream frequently has several buffers. When we find that a particular operation
benefits from a larger buffer, it is usually best to increase just its buffer
size rather than the default buffer size for all Hadoop i/o streams.
Yes. I was not planning to increase default buffer size in this patch.
> Use FileChannel.transferTo() when data is read from DataNode.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3164
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dfs
> Reporter: Raghu Angadi
> Assignee: Raghu Angadi
> Fix For: 0.18.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-3164.patch, HADOOP-3164.patch, HADOOP-3164.patch,
> HADOOP-3164.patch, HADOOP-3164.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-2312 talks about using FileChannel's
> [{{transferTo()}}|http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/nio/channels/FileChannel.html#transferTo(long,%20long,%20java.nio.channels.WritableByteChannel)]
> and
> [{{transferFrom()}}|http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/nio/channels/FileChannel.html#transferFrom(java.nio.channels.ReadableByteChannel,%20long,%20long)]
> in DataNode.
> At the time DataNode neither used NIO sockets nor wrote large chunks of
> contiguous block data to socket. Hadoop 0.17 does both when data is seved to
> clients (and other datanodes). I am planning to try using transferTo() in the
> trunk. This might reduce DataNode's cpu by another 50% or more.
> Once HADOOP-1702 is committed, we can look into using transferFrom().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
