[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604216#action_12604216
]
Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-3517:
----------------------------------------
Probably you meant '<' instead of '>' sign. I think this should work:
{noformat}
&&
(numPendingRequests <
numCopiers*MAX_STALLED_SHUFFLE_THREADS_FRACTION &&
numPendingRequests < numRequiredMapOutputs))
{noformat}
> The last InMemory merge may be missed
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3517
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mapred
> Affects Versions: 0.18.0
> Reporter: Devaraj Das
> Assignee: Arun C Murthy
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.18.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-3517_1_20080610.patch
>
>
> This is post HADOOP-3366. The inmem merge thread has the loop:
> {code}
> while (!exitInMemMerge) {
> ramManager.waitForDataToMerge();
> doInMemMerge();
> }
> {code}
> The fetchOutputs, at the end of copying everything, does the following:
> {code}
> exitInMemMerge = true;
> ramManager.close();
> {code}
> Now if the merge thread is doing a merge (inside the doInMemMerge method)
> when the exitInMemMerge is set to true, the loop will break and the last
> merge of the files that got shuffled recently will be skipped.
> ramManager.close(), that internally does a final notify to the merge thread
> also won't have any effect in this case.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
