[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606239#action_12606239
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3586:
-----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12384244/3586-2.patch
  against trunk revision 669343.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    -1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
                        Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.

    -1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2690/console

This message is automatically generated.

> keep combiner backward compatible with earlier versions of hadoop
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3586
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3586
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>            Assignee: Chris Douglas
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.18.0
>
>         Attachments: 3586-0.patch, 3586-1.patch, 3586-2.patch
>
>
> In hadoop 16 and earlier, the combiner was guaranteed to run once and only 
> once for each map. In 17 this compatibility was slightly broken: the combiner 
> does not run if a single <K,V> occupies the entire sort buffer. In 18, this 
> is further changed to where the combiner can be called multiple times on both 
> map and reduce sides.
> This breaks Pig's current implementation of the combiner and it is not easy 
> to fix in a short period of time.
> We would like to ask that for a way for an application to ask for a backward 
> compatible behavior for some period of time until it can adjust to the new 
> behavior.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to