[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606784#action_12606784 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3505: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12384368/HADOOP-3505.2 against trunk revision 669790. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2707/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2707/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2707/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2707/console This message is automatically generated. > omissions in HOD documentation > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-3505 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3505 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/hod, documentation > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.18.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-3505, HADOOP-3505.1, HADOOP-3505.2 > > > There's a couple HOD limitations that really trip up the unwary. > Two I've encountered are that hod can't take relative paths on the command > line, and that if you pass hod a tarball with a modified /conf, then the > cluster will fail mysteriously to be initialized. > I don't see any references to either in the documentation, and it'd be great > to write this down. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.