Please forgive the previous profane response. This account is used for some internal testing and was unfortunately simultaneously being used to test some heavy usage delivery mailing list accounts as well as vacation message/auto responders. I have deleted the post on the JIRA ticket, but unfortunately I can't take it back out of your inbox.
Once again, please forgive this transgression. -----Original Message----- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:43am To: [email protected] Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3478) The algorithm to decide map re-execution on fetch failures can be improved [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608455#action_12608455 ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] commented on HADOOP-3478: ------------------------------------------ **** off! > The algorithm to decide map re-execution on fetch failures can be improved > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3478 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3478 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jothi Padmanabhan > Assignee: Jothi Padmanabhan > Attachments: hadoop-3478-v1.patch, hadoop-3478.patch > > > The algorithm to decide map re-execution on fetch failures can be improved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
