[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12611916#action_12611916
 ] 

Qi Ji commented on HADOOP-3596:
-------------------------------

Yeah, when the file number approximates 100 million the overall performance is 
greatly affected by name node performance. We are going  to work this out by a 
patch about cooperative multi namenodes soon.

> Namenode cluster(multi namenode working in active-active mode) to keep high 
> availability and expansivity
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3596
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3596
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: dfs
>         Environment: Hadoop cluster on more than thousands of nodes, most of 
> all, the number of files is mass.
>            Reporter: Meng Xu
>   Original Estimate: 672h
>  Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
>  If we use the DFS to store a great quantity of files which is very small, 
> i.e. the namenode is under high pressure of indexing files, should we 
> consider to introduce other namenodes working concurrently for availability 
> and scalability?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to