[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617260#action_12617260
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3840:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12386969/HADOOP-3840-v2.patch
against trunk revision 679930.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2957/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2957/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2957/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2957/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Support pluggable speculative execution
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3840
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: mapred
> Reporter: Matei Zaharia
> Assignee: Matei Zaharia
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HADOOP-3840-v1.txt, HADOOP-3840-v2.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-3412 introduced an way to plug in a job scheduler for MapReduce.
> However, the job schedulers all use JobInProgress.obtainNewMapTask or
> obtainNewReduceTask to select tasks to run from each job, which uses a
> threshold-based speculative execution algorithm that has several shortcomings
> (see JIRAs about the scheduler not speculating tasks that freeze after having
> 80% progress for example). As a first step towards supporting better
> speculative execution policies while not breaking backwards compatibility, it
> makes sense to make the speculative execution policy pluggable. Luckily this
> is easy - we just need an interface around obtainNewMapTask and
> obtainNewReduceTask. This JIRA suggests adding a TaskSelector abstract class
> which, given a TaskTracker and a JobInProgress, chooses a task to run on the
> tracker. A default implementation that uses the current methods in
> JobInProgress is provided. Both TaskSchedulers in trunk are changed to use
> TaskSelector.
> In addition, there are methods to count how many speculative tasks a job
> needs, since TaskInProgress.hasSpeculative() may not work if we change the
> algorithm for selecting speculative tasks. This count is needed for some
> schedulers, such as a fair scheduler.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
