[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638405#action_12638405 ]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-4044: -------------------------------------- Konstantin> this argument is about the programming style rather than performance or anything else It's clearly about both of those. We wish to make a change motivated by performance, and the question is how best to implement that change. We have two proposals on the table, one that is less invasive but uses a discouraged style, and one that involves substantial changes but avoids that style problem. I tried earlier to remove the discussion from style guidelines to the underlying reason for those guidelines --that an API's purpose is to model expected control and data flow--but that argument seems to have caused more confusion than it has helped, so I've mostly reverted to citing style guidelines. Konstantin> FileSystem is the first layer for which link values make sense. The fact that that layer is fully-resolved and known indicates that links should be a first-class value in the API. All of the other layers you present are part of a single module (HDFS) whose job is to present itself as a FileSystem. If HDFS is implementing the FileSystem API, then FileSystem's datatypes are not alien to HDFS. This is the same twist that Sanjay pursued. Yes, the link URI is to a file outside of that particular HDFS filesystem, but link URIs are normal data that HDFS accepts as parameters (when adding a symbolic link), stores, and returns (when dereferencing a link). So this is not an alien object or an unexpected situation. A link to another filesystem is a sensible, first class value within HDFS. > Create symbolic links in HDFS > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4044 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4044 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Attachments: symLink1.patch, symLink1.patch, symLink4.patch, > symLink5.patch, symLink6.patch, symLink8.patch, symLink9.patch > > > HDFS should support symbolic links. A symbolic link is a special type of file > that contains a reference to another file or directory in the form of an > absolute or relative path and that affects pathname resolution. Programs > which read or write to files named by a symbolic link will behave as if > operating directly on the target file. However, archiving utilities can > handle symbolic links specially and manipulate them directly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.