[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12639711#action_12639711
 ] 

Greg Wilkins commented on HADOOP-1650:
--------------------------------------

Note that in an email conversation many months ago with somebody, I realized 
that one of your problems with performance was almost certainly that the 
default threadpool size had been reduced from 255 to 50 threads in jetty.  This 
was because we are mostly using the NIO connector. But if hadoop is still using 
the socket connector, then it will need a larger threadpool



> Upgrade Jetty to 6.x
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1650
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1650
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Devaraj Das
>         Attachments: 1650-20080120.patch, 1650-jetty6.1.9.patch, 
> 1650-jetty6.1.9.v1.patch, hadoop-1650-jetty6.1.5.patch, 
> hadoop-jetty6.1.4-lib.tar.gz, hadoop-jetty6.1.6-lib.tar.gz, 
> hadoop-jetty6.1.9-lib.tar.gz, jetty-hadoop-6.1.6.patch, jetty-hbase.patch, 
> jetty6.1.4.patch, jetty6.1.6.patch
>
>
> This is the third attempt at moving to jetty6. Apparently, the jetty-6.1.4 
> has fixed some of the issues we discovered in jetty during HADOOP-736 and 
> HADOOP-1273. I'd like to keep this issue open for sometime so that we have 
> enough time to test out things.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to