[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642062#action_12642062
 ] 

Amar Kamat commented on HADOOP-4472:
------------------------------------

+1

> Should we move out the creation of setup/cleanup tasks from 
> JobInProgress.initTasks()? 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-4472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4472
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Vivek Ratan
>
> JobInProgress.initTasks() creates TIPs for map and reduce tasks, and also the 
> newly-introduced setup and cleanup tasks. initTasks() is called by the 
> schedulers, as for reasons of memory optimizations, schedulers may choose to 
> initialize M/R tasks at various moments (the Capacity Scheduler, for example, 
> calls initTasks() just when it considers a job for running). One can say that 
> Schedulers 'own' the initialization of M/R tasks in a job. Furthermore the JT 
> 'owns' the setup and cleanup tasks (it schedules them, and Schedulers are 
> unaware of these tasks). This causes a problematic dependency between the JT 
> and a Scheduler. For example, the Capacity Scheduler calls initTasks() and 
> immediately calls JobInProgress.obtainNewMapTask for a map task. This is a 
> problem today, because we cannot run any map or reduce tasks before the setup 
> task is run, which the Capacity Scheduler is not aware of. 
> Either all Schedulers are explicitly aware of setup/cleanup tasks and their 
> dependencies with M/R tasks (in which case, Schedulers 'own' the creation and 
> scheduling of all these tasks correctly), or the JT 'owns' the setup/cleanup 
> tasks and Schedulers are completely unaware of them (in which case, the 
> creation of setup/cleanup tasks must be moved out of initTasks into a 
> separate method which is called by the JT). 
> I think the latter is the right way to go (unless we implement HADOOP-4421, 
> in which case the former option may be viable as well). 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to