[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12643676#action_12643676
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-942:
--------------------------------------------
I think HADOOP-1627 replaced one confusing message "State : In Service" with
another "Decommission State : Normal".
Doesn't it sound confusing for a dead node to have "Decommission State :
Normal"?
This field should not be a decommission state but rather a state of the node,
which includes states like
- In service
- Out of Service (dead)
- Decommission in progress.
- Decommissioned.
Should we reopen this issue or create a new one?
> dfsadmin -report returns deadnode as "In Service"
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-942
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-942
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Reporter: Koji Noguchi
> Assignee: dhruba borthakur
> Priority: Trivial
>
> dfsadmin -report returned a deadnode entry as follows.
> Name: hostA.zzz.com:12345
> State : In Service
> Total raw bytes: 0 (0.0 k)
> Used raw bytes: 0 (0.0 k)
> % used: NaN%
> "in service" is confusing for a node that's not running a datanode.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
