[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658036#action_12658036
 ] 

Jothi Padmanabhan commented on HADOOP-1338:
-------------------------------------------

I did another test to see if pulling in more data per connection is beneficial. 
I just ran a simple client/server application on sockets. In the following 
table, for each transfer, a connection was created and destroyed.

Here are the results

A. When nodes are in the same rack

||Transfer Size (MB)||Num Transfers||Total Time (seconds)||
|50|200|123  
|100|100|109
|200|50|101
|400|25|97

B. When the nodes were on a different rack

||Transfer Size (MB)||Num Transfers||Total Time (seconds)||
|50|200|158  
|100|100|142
|200|50|134
|400|25|130

>From these results it does appear that there could be a small but definite 
>advantage in bunching the outputs, especially when each output is small.

Thoughts?


> Improve the shuffle phase by using the "connection: keep-alive" and doing 
> batch transfers of files
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1338
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1338
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>
> We should do transfers of map outputs at the granularity of  
> *total-bytes-transferred* rather than the current way of transferring a 
> single file and then closing the connection to the server. A single 
> TaskTracker might have a couple of map output files for a given reduce, and 
> we should transfer multiple of them (upto a certain total size) in a single 
> connection to the TaskTracker. Using HTTP-1.1's keep-alive connection would 
> help since it would keep the connection open for more than one file transfer. 
> We should limit the transfers to a certain size so that we don't hold up a 
> jetty thread indefinitely (and cause timeouts for other clients).
> Overall, this should give us improved performance.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to