[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664774#action_12664774
 ] 

Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5027:
------------------------------------------------

As suggested by Rob, if the reported block is ignored in NN, the data available 
guarantee will not be as good as before.   Specifically, the existing data 
stored in the last block being reopened may not be replicated.  I think we need 
to work on the design first.

> Block report processing should compare gneration stamp
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5027
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5027
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE
>             Fix For: 0.19.1
>
>         Attachments: 5027_20090114.patch
>
>
> If a reported block has a different generation stamp then the one stored in 
> the NameNode, the reported block will be considered as invalid.  This is 
> incorrect since blocks with larger generation stamp are valid.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to