[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12668637#action_12668637
 ] 

Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-4663:
---------------------------------------

I still feel very uncomfortable about prompting blocks under 
"blocksBeingWritten". Basically this changes the state of these blocks. 
DataNode does not know that these blocks are being written any more. In the 
most recent patch to HADOOP-4692, depending on the state of blocks, block 
replication takes different behavior. It may wrongly delete on-disk block if 
its length does not match the NN recorded length if a being written block is 
prompted to be a permanent block.

> Datanode should delete files under tmp when upgraded from 0.17
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-4663
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4663
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.18.0
>            Reporter: Raghu Angadi
>            Assignee: dhruba borthakur
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.19.1
>
>         Attachments: deleteTmp.patch, deleteTmp2.patch, deleteTmp_0.18.patch, 
> handleTmp1.patch
>
>
> Before 0.18, when Datanode restarts, it deletes files under data-dir/tmp  
> directory since these files are not valid anymore. But in 0.18 it moves these 
> files to normal directory incorrectly making them valid blocks. One of the 
> following would work :
> - remove the tmp files during upgrade, or
> - if the files under /tmp are in pre-18 format (i.e. no generation), delete 
> them.
> Currently effect of this bug is that, these files end up failing block 
> verification and eventually get deleted. But cause incorrect over-replication 
> at the namenode before that.
> Also it looks like our policy regd treating files under tmp needs to be 
> defined better. Right now there are probably one or two more bugs with it. 
> Dhruba, please file them if you rememeber.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to