Sounds good. I would much rather wait and have fsync() done correctly in 0.20 than get some sort of hacked version in 0.19. I'll create a couple of issues and mark them for 0.20 Thanks.
- Doug On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Doug Judd wrote: > > What do you recommend? Is there anyway we could get these two issues >> fixed >> for 0.19.1, or should I file issues for them and get them on the schedule >> for 0.19.2? >> > > Given the outstanding problems and general level of uncertainty, I'd favor > releasing a 0.19.1 with the equivalent of the 0.18.3 disable on fsync and > append. Let's get them fixed in 0.20 first and then we can debate whether > the rewards of pushing them back into an 0.19.2 would make sense. I'm pretty > uncomfortable at the moment with how the entire functional complex seems to > cause a continuous stream of problems. > > -- Owen >
