It sounds like we agree that we should release 0.19.1 with append
throwing a UnsupportedOperationException and sync getting the same
reduced semantics as 0.18.3.
I have filed 2 Jira's to get this done:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5224
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5225
When these are committed, I will roll a Hadoop 0.19.1 candidate release.
Nige
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Doug Judd wrote:
Sounds good. I would much rather wait and have fsync() done
correctly in
0.20 than get some sort of hacked version in 0.19. I'll create a
couple of
issues and mark them for 0.20 Thanks.
- Doug
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org>
wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Doug Judd wrote:
What do you recommend? Is there anyway we could get these two issues
fixed
for 0.19.1, or should I file issues for them and get them on the
schedule
for 0.19.2?
Given the outstanding problems and general level of uncertainty,
I'd favor
releasing a 0.19.1 with the equivalent of the 0.18.3 disable on
fsync and
append. Let's get them fixed in 0.20 first and then we can debate
whether
the rewards of pushing them back into an 0.19.2 would make sense.
I'm pretty
uncomfortable at the moment with how the entire functional complex
seems to
cause a continuous stream of problems.
-- Owen
