On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Brian Bockelman wrote:
Dumb comment:
Not really
Although I know what issue HADOOP-3638 is referring to, it's not a great way for the branch name to be self-descriptive.
Actually, I find it much more natural to label branches with jira numbers than names. It might help if there is a HADOOP-*.readme at the top level that describes the branch in words.
-- Owen
