[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680963#action_12680963
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-5453:
------------------------------------------
One option would be to ensure that all Namenode threads are shutdown without
killing the entire JVM. In that case, if an application is running the Namenode
within its own JVM, that application can detect that the Namenode has exited
and than take appropriate action.
> Could FSEditLog report problems more elegantly than with System.exit(-1)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5453
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5453
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Minor
>
> When FSEdit encounters problems, it prints something and then exits.
> It would be better for any in-JVM deployments of FSEdit for these to be
> raised in some other way (such as throwing an exception), rather than taking
> down the whole JVM. That could be in JUnit tests, or it could be inside other
> applications. Test runners and the like can intercept those System.exit()
> calls with their own Security Manager -often turning the System.exit()
> operation into an exception there and then. If FSEdit did that itself, it may
> be easier to stay in control.
> The current approach has some benefits -it can exit regardless of which
> thread has encountered problems, but it is tricky to test.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
