[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12700952#action_12700952
]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-5708:
--------------------------------------
> The configuration would contain all of the defaults picked up from my
> non-grid machine, and would completely overwrite all the defaults on that
> grid.
The defaults come from the jar file, and the jar must currently have the same
version of the code in the cluster, so in practice we overwrite things with the
same values.
Long-term, if we permit users with one version of Hadoop installed to submit
jobs to a cluster running a different version, then sending the defaults could
perhaps cause problems. But anything that should not be overridden should be
declared final in the cluster's configuration, and otherwise the user's
configuration, including defaults, should be observed, no?
> Configuration should provide a way to write only properties that have been set
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5708
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5708
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: conf
> Affects Versions: 0.19.1
> Reporter: Topher ZiCornell
> Priority: Minor
>
> The Configuration.write and .writeXml methods always output all properties,
> whether they came from a default source, a loaded resource file, or an
> "overlay" set call. There should be a way to write only the properties that
> were set, leaving out the properties that came from a default source.
> Why? Suppose I build a configuration on a machine that is not associated
> with a grid, write it out to XML, then try to load it on a grid gateway. The
> configuration would contain all of the defaults picked up from my non-grid
> machine, and would completely overwrite all the defaults on that grid.
> I propose to add methods to write out only the overlay values in Object and
> XML formats.
> I see two options for implementing this:
> 1) Either completely new methods could be crafted (writeOverlay(DataOutput)
> and writeOverlayXml(OutputStream), or
> 2) The existing write() and writeXml() methods could be adjusted to take an
> additional parameter indicating whether the full properties or overlay
> properties should be written. (Of course, the existing write() and
> writeXml() methods would remain, defaulting to the current behavior.)
> Option 1 has less impact to existing code. Option 2 is a cleaner
> implementation with less code-duplication involved. I would much prefer to
> do option 2.
> Oh, and in case it's not clear, I'm offering to make this change and submit
> it.
> Thoughts?
> . Topher
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
