[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12708637#action_12708637
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-5737:
--------------------------------

Integrated in Hadoop-trunk #834 (See 
[http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-trunk/834/])
    . Fixes a problem in the way the JobTracker used to talk to other daemons 
like the NameNode to get the job's files. Also adds APIs in the JobTracker to 
get the FileSystem objects as per the JobTracker's configuration. Contributed 
by Amar Kamat.


> UGI checks in testcases are broken
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5737
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5737
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Amar Kamat
>            Assignee: Amar Kamat
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-5737-v1.3.patch, HADOOP-5737-v1.5.patch, 
> HADOOP-5737-v1.7.patch
>
>
> While running {{TestMiniMRWithDFSWithDistinctUsers}}, I used this patch to 
> test the ugi checks 
> {code}
> Index: src/hdfs/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/PermissionChecker.java
> ===================================================================
> --- src/hdfs/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/PermissionChecker.java    
> (revision 768189)
> +++ src/hdfs/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/PermissionChecker.java    
> (working copy)
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>      if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
>        LOG.debug("ugi=" + ugi);
>      }
> +    LOG.info("ugi=" + ugi);
>  
>      if (ugi != null) {
>        user = ugi.getUserName();
> {code}
> While initializing a job, the ugi information should point to jobtracker as 
> jobtracker does a dfs read. But today we will see that the log shows _pi_ as 
> the caller instead of the jobtracker.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to