[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12710274#action_12710274
 ] 

Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-5369:
----------------------------------------

The tests failures are due to HADOOP-5847

> Small tweaks to reduce MapFile index size
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5369
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ben Maurer
>            Assignee: Ben Maurer
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>         Attachments: mapfile.patch, smaller_mapfile.patch, 
> smaller_mapfile.patch, smaller_mapfile.patch, smaller_mapfile.patch, 
> smaller_mapfile.patch
>
>
> Two minor tweaks can help reduce the memory overhead of the MapFile index a 
> bit:
> 1) Because the index file is a sequence file, it's length is not known. That 
> means the index is built using the standard "mulitply the size of the buffer 
> on overflow" with a factor of 3/2. With small keys, the slack in the index 
> can be substantial. This patch has a constant upper bound on the amount of 
> slack allowed.
> 2) In block compressed map files the index file often has entries with the 
> same offset (because the compressed block had more than index interval keys). 
> The entries with identical offsets do not help MapFile do random access any 
> faster. This patch eliminates these types of entries from new map files, and 
> ignores them while reading old map files. This patch greatly helped with 
> memory usage on a compressed hbase table.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to