[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713701#action_12713701
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-4681:
--------------------------------------
> Isn't that what this patch effects (+/- the 2x
> dfs.client.max.block.acquire.failures semantics, which are a little odd)?
sort of, I think. It is an improvement, but only on the same lines as the
current structure (no explicit policy, hard to see what happens and when). For
e.g. it looks like 'a failure' is defined as not being able to connect/fetch
from all the replicas. Also success is defined as just being able to get 'ok'
from datanode. Which implies it might again go into infinite loop in some
conditions (say all replicas are corrupt, thus only one is remaining, and it
fails checksum at one particular position).
The final fix could be as simiple as moving resetting 'failures' to
readBuffer(). But I would prefer to add things like 'failures' to be
incremented for every failure with a replica and limit the count to something
like min(#replicas, large value like 10).
Finally, I am mainly proposing an explicit policy in a code comment. 0.21 is
fine.. big users like HBASE can have it backported.
> DFSClient block read failures cause open DFSInputStream to become unusable
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-4681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4681
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.18.2, 0.19.0, 0.19.1, 0.20.0
> Reporter: Igor Bolotin
> Fix For: 0.19.2
>
> Attachments: 4681.patch
>
>
> We are using some Lucene indexes directly from HDFS and for quite long time
> we were using Hadoop version 0.15.3.
> When tried to upgrade to Hadoop 0.19 - index searches started to fail with
> exceptions like:
> 2008-11-13 16:50:20,314 WARN [Listener-4] [] DFSClient : DFS Read:
> java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: blk_5604690829708125511_15489
> file=/usr/collarity/data/urls-new/part-00000/20081110-163426/_0.tis
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(DFSClient.java:1708)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1536)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1663)
> at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:132)
> at
> org.apache.nutch.indexer.FsDirectory$DfsIndexInput.readInternal(FsDirectory.java:174)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.refill(BufferedIndexInput.java:152)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readByte(BufferedIndexInput.java:38)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.IndexInput.readVInt(IndexInput.java:76)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermBuffer.read(TermBuffer.java:63)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentTermEnum.next(SegmentTermEnum.java:131)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentTermEnum.scanTo(SegmentTermEnum.java:162)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermInfosReader.scanEnum(TermInfosReader.java:223)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermInfosReader.get(TermInfosReader.java:217)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentTermDocs.seek(SegmentTermDocs.java:54)
> ...
> The investigation showed that the root of this issue is that we exceeded # of
> xcievers in the data nodes and that was fixed by changing configuration
> settings to 2k.
> However - one thing that bothered me was that even after datanodes recovered
> from overload and most of client servers had been shut down - we still
> observed errors in the logs of running servers.
> Further investigation showed that fix for HADOOP-1911 introduced another
> problem - the DFSInputStream instance might become unusable once number of
> failures over lifetime of this instance exceeds configured threshold.
> The fix for this specific issue seems to be trivial - just reset failure
> counter before reading next block (patch will be attached shortly).
> This seems to be also related to HADOOP-3185, but I'm not sure I really
> understand necessity of keeping track of failed block accesses in the DFS
> client.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
