[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715384#action_12715384
 ] 

Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-5884:
------------------------------------------

Some comments on test cases:

- testClusterBlockingForLackOfMemory needs updates to validate the number of 
slots
- I think we may need two additional tests:
-- We should have a test to check the change in sorting of queues done based on 
slots than running tasks. We could do this by submitting 2 jobs to 2 queues, 1 
is normal and the other is high RAM. We can check that for every assignTasks 
call, if 1 task of the high RAM job is scheduled, two tasks of the normal job 
are (assuming 2 slots for a task of the high RAM Jobs). 
-- We should have a check on user limits that a high RAM job hits it's user 
limits twice as fast as a normal job, again assuming 2 slots for a task of the 
high RAM job.

> Capacity scheduler should account high memory jobs as using more capacity of 
> the queue
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5884
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: contrib/capacity-sched
>            Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala
>            Assignee: Vinod K V
>         Attachments: HADOOP-5884-20090529.1.txt
>
>
> Currently, when a high memory job is scheduled by the capacity scheduler, 
> each task scheduled counts only once in the capacity of the queue, though it 
> may actually be preventing other jobs from using spare slots on that node 
> because of its higher memory requirements. In order to be fair, the capacity 
> scheduler should proportionally (with respect to default memory) account high 
> memory jobs as using a larger capacity of the queue.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to