[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716840#action_12716840
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-5963:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12409819/Hadoop-5963.patch
against trunk revision 782083.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
-1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/console
This message is automatically generated.
> unnecessary exception catch in NNBench
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5963
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5963
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: test
> Reporter: Boris Shkolnik
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Hadoop-5963.patch
>
>
> NNBench.createControlFiles - catches Exception (even though only IOException
> is thrown) and then throws a new IOException with message from original. This
> seems unnecessary and lossfull, because we loose stack info form the original
> exception.
> Suggestion - remove the catch part of try block.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.