[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716840#action_12716840 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-5963: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12409819/Hadoop-5963.patch against trunk revision 782083. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/471/console This message is automatically generated. > unnecessary exception catch in NNBench > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5963 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5963 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: Hadoop-5963.patch > > > NNBench.createControlFiles - catches Exception (even though only IOException > is thrown) and then throws a new IOException with message from original. This > seems unnecessary and lossfull, because we loose stack info form the original > exception. > Suggestion - remove the catch part of try block. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.