On Nov 21, 2007 9:58 PM, Peter Arrenbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Martin > > > I would prefer to see engineering work go into something > > like auto-reduction of the table array when many elements > > have been removed, but that's a hard problem. > > Would you care to elaborate? At first glance, this seems not > especially hard to me, in particular since tightResize() would be able > to switch to a smaller array without causing a short spike of needing > more memory first. But I'm sure I have overlooked something here.
Ah, you don't want it to oscillate. Is that it? -peter
