> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:01:42 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 08/02/2008 04:54 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote: >> Some time ago I've discussed this with Neal Gafter. My conclusion is, >> that those problems could be solved by a "this" return type. > > Or just by using covariant return types, which already exist in the > language for this very purpose. Why is everyone so keen to tear up the > language, in order to add solutions to problems that already have solutions?
Excellent question! - Mark
